1. California Democrat drafting legislation to safeguard AI tools like CHATGPT, aiming to address concerns of content ripping, scams, and weakened democracy.
2. Measures to ensure compensation for content creators whose work is used to train AI data sets.
3. Drafting legislation to require clear identification of AI-generated material to avoid confusion with human-generated services and prevent abuse.
A California Democrat, Rep. Tony Cárdenas, is drafting legislation to regulate artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as CHATGPT. He is working with other lawmakers to address concerns related to content ripping, scams, and threats to democracy caused by generative AI tools. Cárdenas emphasizes the urgency of taking action to prevent potential harms associated with AI, which could negatively impact innovators and disrupt the economy and politics. He is optimistic about passing new tech rules with bipartisan support, citing the industry’s openness to regulation as an opportunity for collaboration.
One focus of the legislation is to ensure that content creators are fairly compensated when their work is used to train AI data sets. The issue of compensating individuals whose information is collected to build AI tools has gained attention, highlighted during a Senate hearing with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. Cárdenas believes that protecting intellectual property and enabling individuals to pursue innovative and profitable endeavors is crucial. He is also drafting measures to require clear identification of AI-generated material, aiming to address the challenge of distinguishing between AI and human-generated services on online platforms.
Furthermore, Cárdenas highlights concerns regarding AI scams, as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) warns about the potential for scammers to exploit AI tools for deceptive purposes. To address this issue, Cárdenas argues for increased funding and potential new powers for the FTC to effectively monitor and regulate the rapidly evolving AI landscape. However, there is pushback from Republicans and business groups who express reservations about stringent enforcement and its impact on innovation. Despite these concerns, Cárdenas believes that the need to prevent abuse and take advantage of the current window of time outweighs the potential risks of stifling AI innovation.
